Case Studies

An NIH study of treatments for high blood pressure, called the ALLHAT trial, shows some of the strengths and limitations of comparative effectiveness research to improve patient care. More...

Recent Blog Posts

February 3, 2012 |

On Tuesday night, PIPC Chairman Tony Coelho joined former HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson at the University of Charleston in West Virginia for a speaker series titled "Who Decides Patient Treatments" to discuss the future of health care in the United States.

| Read More
January 30, 2012 |

PCORI released a draft of their National Priorities for Research and Research Agenda for public comment. The PCORI Board, which is responsible for funding research, is asking for a 55 day public comment period to discuss and solicit feedback from patients, caregivers, professionals, and the general public on the research priorities.

In the draft, PCORI prioritized five broad research areas:

| Read More
October 18, 2011 |

When conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research it is crucial to understand the differences between the players involved in the process. In his remarks at the  2nd Annual Forum on Achieving Patient centeredness , Marc Boutin, executive vice president and COO at the National Health Council, discussed the important differences between the three major players in the process: the patient, the consumer, and the patient advocacy organization. He stated that many times when the patient is discussed they are not defined.

| Read More

For Reporters

For journalists and other media professionals

More Information

Stay Connected

PIPC Continues to Press on Comparative Effectiveness Research

WASHINGTON, DC - The Partnership to Improve Patient Care(PIPC), is disappointed that the House Energy and Commerce Committee did not act on the bipartisan Christensen-Inslee-Upton-Walden amendment, which promoted patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER).  The amendment has strong bipartisan support and would advance an objective, credible and independent CER program that meets the needs of all patients.
 
"We appreciate Committee members' work on this issue, and Chairman Waxman's commitment to working to include the amendment in the final House health reform bill," PIPC Chairman Tony Coelho said. "PIPC will continue to work in support of patient-centered CER as part of comprehensive health care reform."
 
The Christensen-Inslee-Upton-Walden amendment was based on legislation introduced by Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) in the House (H.R. 2502) and Sens. Baucus and Conrad in the Senate (S. 1213). "This approach to CER will ensure that the research is focused on the needs of patients, and is not used in ways that interfere with the treatment decisions made by doctors and their patients," Coelho said. "As a patient myself, I understand that every body is different, and we must protect the ability of physicians and patients to tailor care to the needs of the individual."
 
The Christensen-Inslee-Upton-Walden amendment, like S. 1213 and H.R. 2502, would create an independent Institute to oversee a patient-centered research program. This approach, Coelho noted, is supported by the American Medical Association, AARP, and over 100 organizations representing patients, providers, minority groups, and people with disabilities. This approach also was supported by leaders of the New Democrat Coalition in a recent letter to members of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.
 
About PIPC
The Partnership to Improve Patient Care was formed in November 2008 to support new comparative effectiveness research proposals that are centered on patient and provider needs; raise awareness about the value of well-designed CER; and promote the important role of continued medical innovation as part of the solution to cost and quality challenges in health care. Partnership members include a wide range of healthcare organizations representing patient, provider and industry advocacy groups.

AttachmentSize
PIPC_Continues_To_Press_For_CER.pdf61.16 KB