Case Studies

An NIH study of treatments for high blood pressure, called the ALLHAT trial, shows some of the strengths and limitations of comparative effectiveness research to improve patient care. More...

Recent Blog Posts

Tony Coelho Discusses Patient Care with Former HHS Secretary
February 3, 2012 |

On Tuesday night, PIPC Chairman Tony Coelho joined former HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson at the University of Charleston in West Virginia for a speaker series titled "Who Decides Patient Treatments" to discuss the future of health care in the United States.

 | Read More
PCORI Releases their Draft Priorities
January 30, 2012 |

PCORI released a draft of their National Priorities for Research and Research Agenda for public comment. The PCORI Board, which is responsible for funding research, is asking for a 55 day public comment period to discuss and solicit feedback from patients, caregivers, professionals, and the general public on the research priorities.

In the draft, PCORI prioritized five broad research areas:

 | Read More
Differentiating Patients, Consumers, and Patient Advocacy Organizations
October 18, 2011 |

When conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research it is crucial to understand the differences between the players involved in the process. In his remarks at the  2nd Annual Forum on Achieving Patient centeredness , Marc Boutin, executive vice president and COO at the National Health Council, discussed the important differences between the three major players in the process: the patient, the consumer, and the patient advocacy organization. He stated that many times when the patient is discussed they are not defined.

 | Read More

For Reporters

For journalists and other media professionals

More Information

Stay Connected

Independent and Inclusive

To keep a new CER research entity centered on improving patient care, it is important for it to be independent so that it isn't dominated by any one group. This means everyone in the health care community, including patients and providers, needs to be included, and the group needs to operate with full transparency and public accountability. The entire research process of a new CER entity from deciding priorities to finalizing and communicating research results should be open and transparent to the public. Allowing for public review and comment throughout the research process will give an opportunity to providers, patient advocates, and independent researchers to deliver their perspective and keep the work of institute accountable to the public.