Case Studies

An NIH study of treatments for high blood pressure, called the ALLHAT trial, shows some of the strengths and limitations of comparative effectiveness research to improve patient care. More...

For Reporters

For journalists and other media professionals

More Information

Stay Connected

August 2009

PIPC Chairman Discusses CER on PA Radio

Recently, PIPC Chairman Tony Coelho participated in a radio interview on KDKA News Radio 1020 AM in Pittsburgh, PA, to talk about healthcare reform and specifically comparative effectiveness research (CER).

“I really agree that we need to reform healthcare,” Coelho said.  He then went on to discuss CER and the need to keep this research patient-centered. 

St. Petersburg Times on CER

| Posted in:

The St. Petersburg Times ran an editorial Sunday about the good, the bad and the ugly in the debate over health care reform.

Coelho on Washington State radio

| Posted in:
PIPC Chairman Tony Coehlo was recently on the David Boze radio show, which airs in Washington State, to talk about the importance of doing comparative effectiveness research (CER) right - as part of healthcare reform.   PIPC believes that that CER should be patient-centered.
 

Patient Care – Not Cost – Must be Focus of Future CER

| Posted in:

As the nation continues to focus on the health care debate, PIPC is maintaining its commitment to ensuring patient care – not cost – is the driving force behind new efforts to implement comparative effectiveness research (CER).

Better Information Key to CER, Broader Reform

As Newsweek points out today, there’s a lot of information out there on health care reform. When it comes to comparative effectiveness research (CER), they rightfully state that “supporters of this type of research say it can provide valuable information to doctors, improving care and also lowering cost.”

Making Progress Towards Patient-Centered Health Reform

| Posted in:

In a recent op-ed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer outlined some  important components of health care reform,  including their support  for  “research on health outcomes to better inform the decisions of patients and doctors.”